INPUTDetector · pose · depth · VLM/LLM sharing one accelerator
COREFreshness · deadlines · admission · model-variant choice
OUTPUTUseful results before they become stale
VIDEO / INFERENCE GOVERNORYOUTUBE ↗
External video: this preview is stored locally. No YouTube player, thumbnail or tracking resource is loaded automatically. A connection to Google/YouTube begins only after you click the public demo video.
MEASURED → tuned Triton detector coverage 85% → Vigilant 99% on the measured GPU benchmark · ~20× fewer missed cycles there · four-camera demo: protected stream 0.1–0.2% → 100% fresh cycles under the demonstrated load · tested on NVIDIA GPU and Android/Adreno paths · 900 passing tests in the public repository
External links: GitHub and GitHub Pages are operated by GitHub, Inc. A connection is established only after you follow the respective link.
EDGE SECURITY / AUTONOMOUS SITUATIONAL AWARENESS / DISPATCH
Autonomes Reaktives Entscheidungs-System
INPUTCamera · thermal · radar · specialist detectors · local rules
COREDetect · track · correlate · evidence graph · scenario logic
OUTPUTLive local situation picture · priority · dispatch / workflow action
ProblemConventional security stacks generate detections and alarms, but a control room still has to correlate cameras, thermal feeds, radar and earlier events before deciding whether something is relevant and what should happen next.
SolutionThe system builds a continuously updated situation picture directly at the edge. Domain-specific detectors feed tracked entities and observations into a temporal knowledge graph; source, time, confidence and provenance remain attached. Graph retrieval, rules and reactive decision logic evaluate the evolving situation instead of treating each frame as an isolated event.
OutcomeOn-edge situational awareness can classify and prioritize security events, create a structured local situation report and trigger predefined workflows — for example cue another sensor, notify a control room, or dispatch the nearest available response resource — without requiring cloud inference.
USE CASES → critical-infrastructure perimeter monitoring · industrial / logistics sites · remote facilities · control-room retrofit · mobile or robotic security platforms · multi-sensor verification · ENGINEERING → specialist detector fine-tuning · temporal knowledge graph · provenance-aware graph retrieval / RAG · ONNX / TensorRT edge deployment · camera / thermal / radar fusion
UNSCRIPTED / COMMERCIAL EVALUATION / GAME AI / SOCIAL SIMULATION
UNSCRIPTED / Social Dynamics Runtime
INPUTPlayer action · witnessed event · authored world facts
COREKnowledge · memory · trust · rumours · groups · place mood
OUTPUTA world that changes socially without scripting every branch
ProblemMost open worlds have one invisible shared brain: a flag changes and every NPC effectively knows the same state. An LLM can make dialogue richer without fixing that underlying world model.
SolutionUNSCRIPTED is the runtime behind this approach. Each NPC holds local knowledge with source, confidence and history. Information can spread, mutate, be rejected or forgotten; trust and group membership affect belief; locations carry social state. The runtime decides what happened and what a character may know. A language model is optional and can be limited to wording.
OutcomeThe player changes the world dynamically. Witnesses react first, information travels through the social graph, a street or district can become more suspicious or closed, and characters encountered later can behave differently because of what actually reached them — not because a designer scripted that exact dialogue branch.
External video: this preview is hosted locally. No YouTube player, thumbnail or tracking resource is loaded automatically. Clicking opens YouTube and establishes a connection to Google/YouTube.
INTEGRATION → Godot 4.6 · Unity 6000 LTS / Unity 6 tech stream · Unreal 5.8 + MetaHuman bridge · HTTP/JSON for other engines · deterministic runtime · optional model wording layer · 204 passing tests · sealed evidence run: 2.99M turns / 59,745 invariant checks / 0 violations · 180-day free commercial evaluation for companies of any size
External links: the showcase is hosted on GitHub Pages and the source repository on GitHub. They are not embedded here; the connection begins only when you click.
R&D / INTEGRITY-AWARE FUSED GEOLOCATION
Fused Geolocation
INPUTRaw GNSS · Doppler · IMU · barometer · passive cell
COREES-EKF · clock state · exclusion · integrity / threat logic
OUTPUTPosition + confidence + degradation reason
ProblemIn tunnels, urban canyons or under jamming/spoofing, a normal location API may keep returning a coordinate without telling the application whether it should be trusted.
SolutionThe implemented stack fuses local sensor and satellite evidence with a receiver-clock-aware Error-State Kalman Filter, bounded RAIM/FDE-style exclusion and explicit integrity/threat diagnostics.
OutcomeThe consumer receives both the fused position and an explanation of degraded confidence. The architecture is built to continue conservatively when clean GNSS disappears rather than silently treating all fixes as equal.
IMPLEMENTED → ES-EKF · raw pseudorange / Doppler / carrier phase · clock bias + drift · barometer bias · passive LTE/NR + local tower DB · spoofing/jamming suspicion · replay / truth tracks · R&D → Hidden Markov mode model / Markov-chain transitions · snapping / map matching · multi-hypothesis tracking · independent device-to-device clock reference as future GNSS-time cross-check
R&D / EXPERIENCE SEMANTICS / POST-LINGUISTIC COMMUNICATION
Vigilant ESP / Experience Semantic Protocol
INPUTExperience · knowledge · intent · emotion · context
CORETyped semantic spaces · vector state · provenance · transformation
OUTPUTMachine-readable meaning that can be matched, transferred or rendered
TheoryHuman language compresses many different dimensions — factual knowledge, intention, emotion, sensory qualities, context and temporal continuity — into a linear sentence. ESP asks whether machines need that linguistic bottleneck at all. It represents those dimensions in typed semantic spaces so that an experience or knowledge state can be encoded as a structured vector state with metadata rather than first being rewritten as prose.
Protocol ideaA sender can transmit a machine-readable semantic state — for example what is known, how something felt, what outcome is desired and with what confidence or provenance. A receiving system can compare, transform or combine that state directly. Natural language, an image, sound or another interface becomes a rendering layer at the edge, not necessarily the transport format itself.
First implementationThe current media engine is the first practical implementation of this post-linguistic idea. A film is mapped into an experience genome; a user's desired experience is mapped into the same semantic space. “Like this film, but darker, faster and less violent” becomes a vectorized state transformation rather than only a keyword query.
DirectionThe longer-term goal is broader than media recommendation: agent-to-agent exchange of experience, knowledge and intention in a structured semantic representation that preserves dimensions which ordinary text can flatten or omit.
CONCEPT → typed semantic spaces for knowledge · intention · emotion · context · sensory state · temporal continuity · REPRESENTATION → structured/vector semantic state + metadata / provenance · IMPLEMENTATION → experience genome · tone-shift transformation · hybrid semantic / emotional / thematic retrieval · PAPER → “The Experience Semantic Protocol — A North Star for Post-Linguistic Communication” · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20024213